My City on the Mountain :: Personal Narrative College Flagstaff Essays

My City on the Mountain Flagstaff, Arizona to me has been The City on the hillock with its seemingly beautiful light shining down on to me in the Valley of the Sun. I have planned my get away up the push-down list (as Phoenicians refer to going to Flagstaff) as long as I can remember. Ever since I was old enough to know what a college really was I have known I was going to be attending Northern Arizona University in the fall of 2004. The thought of cool mountain air blowing against my reckon each morning, sure made the wall of heat that actually surrounded my body each time I stepped out side seem unbearable. spirit in a place with pine tree and four seasons filled my every dream. Northern Arizona University was to be my escape from Chandler and my place for a in the raw start. Once there I expected to find new friends, new and better classes, and a place where I could spread my wings. When the day finally came t o sustain my big move to Flagstaff, I was more nervous than I ever imagined was possible. Questions continually came to mind. What if I forgot something important from my room? What if I didnt worry my roomie? What if I did not make friends? And the what-ifs didnt end there, but they were softened when I finally reached campus and was warmly welcomed by those who had moved in beforehand me. Yet, the fears of actual friendship loomed in the back of my mind. As welcome week progressed I was able to start to meet people more and more like me. Although at times it seemed unbearably hard being as shy as I can be. Through each activity I was knotty in I met people I liked, and even some that really were not the type of people I was interested in. Dreams of friends were becoming a human race and the fears in the back of my mind were slowly being quieted.

Media vs. Parenting Essay examples -- Effect Cause Parents Impact chil

Media vs. P arntingWhat impact does sex, violence, drugs, etc. in the media bedevil on children? What stern we do ab off it? How do we residual the tension between freedom of expression and the need to protect children? When you talk about the media and whether or not it is libelous on children, you must examine the satisfying industry and all aspects of its effects on children. It is that the media as a whole is not as harmful to children as some intense other behind, scarce over exposure to certain aspects of certain types of media slew be harmful. To say that all media can be harmful to children is a fallacy that must be avoided when examining this topic. Most people when analyzing this issue tend to focus on drugs, sex, and violence in calls of the television media. Although those are some of the main topics throughout the muniment of this topic, there are more important issues then just that as said. This is an argument that should indefinitely point out the major impa cts on new-made children. so far this will be examining this topic in a much broader sense that will underwrite the media as an entity and not focus only on the shun aspects but also the positive aspects of the media to show that the media is not in all ways gravid for children. Media affecting children is increasingly rising, and is becoming a big figure among childrens behaviors, but other factors such as parenting will also participate to whether media is harmful to children. During the formation of our Constitution, our forefathers had enough foresight to know that one of the closely sacred freedoms that a society can have is freedom of the press. They, however, could not envision how many an(prenominal) different forms of the press there would be in the old age after the Constitution was written. During our nations formative years, the term press was primarily restricted to media in hurt of newspapers and books. Over the years with different courts, congresses, and pr esidents, we have seen an expansion of the term press. This has been made even more so with advancing technology and the global expansion of the media. wherefore when we examine the media we must take a contemporary come out to this issue rather than looking at the issue based on the past. The media has capacious been an behind target for the ills of society. If we go back to the times of the beginnings of World fight II we can see how man... ...of game has little if any social benefit, to the contrary it in many ways teaches children that violence and objectifying women is ok, just as long as it looks cool. In the long run if games such as these remain popular among children and young adults, we will see a worsening of our already decaying morals.As you can plainly see, we as a society cannot place the blame of the problem of forthwiths children on the media and saying that the media is harmful to children. True the media can be harmful, but if it is carefully monitor and pa rents use discretion before saying yes to what their children can play, read, or watch then this problem would be greatly lessened. If we blame the media without ourselves taking action then we are just as responsible because we are allowing the media to cause harm to our children with us just standing by and watching. It is true that the media as an industry must ensure that the products and programming that they are putting out is targeted to the proper markets, but in the end it is ultimately up to the parents to decide what is best for their children. It is the parents responsibility to determine what is or is not harmful to their children. Media vs. Parenting Essay examples -- Effect Cause Parents Impact chilMedia vs. ParentingWhat impact does sex, violence, drugs, etc. in the media have on children? What can we do about it? How do we balance the tension between freedom of expression and the need to protect children? When you talk about the media and whether or not it is harmful on children, you must examine the whole industry and all aspects of its effects on children. It is that the media as a whole is not as harmful to children as some intense other can, but over exposure to certain aspects of certain types of media can be harmful. To say that all media can be harmful to children is a fallacy that must be avoided when examining this topic. Most people when analyzing this issue tend to focus on drugs, sex, and violence in cost of the television media. Although those are some of the main topics throughout the history of this topic, there are more important issues then just that as said. This is an argument that should indefinitely point out the major impacts on young children. However this will be examining this topic in a much broader sense that will encompass the media as an entity and not focus only on the negative aspects but also the positive aspects of the media to show that the media is not in all ways bad for children. Media affe cting children is increasingly rising, and is becoming a big factor among childrens behaviors, but other factors such as parenting will also participate to whether media is harmful to children. During the formation of our Constitution, our forefathers had enough foresight to know that one of the most sacred freedoms that a society can have is freedom of the press. They, however, could not envision how many different forms of the press there would be in the years after the Constitution was written. During our nations formative years, the term press was primarily restricted to media in terms of newspapers and books. Over the years with different courts, congresses, and presidents, we have seen an expansion of the term press. This has been made even more so with advancing technology and the global expansion of the media. Therefore when we examine the media we must take a contemporary approach to this issue rather than looking at the issue based on the past. The media has long been an e asy target for the ills of society. If we go back to the times of the beginnings of World War II we can see how man... ...of game has little if any social benefit, to the contrary it in many ways teaches children that violence and objectifying women is ok, just as long as it looks cool. In the long run if games such as these remain popular among children and young adults, we will see a worsening of our already decaying morals.As you can plainly see, we as a society cannot place the blame of the problem of todays children on the media and saying that the media is harmful to children. True the media can be harmful, but if it is carefully monitor and parents use discretion before saying yes to what their children can play, read, or watch then this problem would be greatly lessened. If we blame the media without ourselves taking action then we are just as responsible because we are allowing the media to cause harm to our children with us just standing by and watching. It is true that t he media as an industry must ensure that the products and programming that they are putting out is targeted to the proper markets, but in the end it is ultimately up to the parents to decide what is best for their children. It is the parents responsibility to determine what is or is not harmful to their children.

Thomas Hardy’s poem “Hap Essay -- Thomas Hardy Hap Poetry Poem Analys

Thomas Hardys poem Hap poetry is ultimately defined as a major literary genre. How boring that is for such a beautiful literary form. I believe that poetry is a genre devoted to art, complexity, and precision. All in which the poet does more than just writing he or she takes that which is indescribable and finds words for it through poetry. Granted, this leaves poetry vastly rude to interpretation. After all, each and every poet expresses him or herself in a different way with different meter, rhyme, mood, and meaning. Leaving one poem practically unlike every other, like a snowflake. This is poetry, and this is also why poetry is so hard to analyze. Every person that has read and analyzed a poem has been left wonder what the author of the poem had cerebrateed by it. Often there is room for more than one interpretation, so many are often left question if they correctly interpreted a poem. Several arguments could be left unfinished with the phrase, Well, how do you know? Did the au thor of the poem tell you? In which the answer is, with rare exceptions, no. Authors leave clues in, in between, and all throughout their poems. Thats part of the art. They dont just tell the endorsers what the poem means. That would take away from it. Instead, the reader must keep in mind that everything is in a poem for a reason. The author may not come out and say what a poem is about, but he or she will leave enough information in the poem for someone dedicated enough to find. I intend to devote such a dedication to Thomas Hardys poem Hap, in order to analyze, and hopefully, derive this poem through a process. perhaps the first and most obvious step would be to read the poem. Just read it. As in begin reading material and dont stop, fee... ...becomes a piece of literature that a reader can appreciate. These, also, are by no means the only steps a reader could take to understand a poem. Theres always more time that can be devoted to understanding a poem. There is also a for ce of research on poetry that a reader could use in order to better understand it, just as I would have been woolly without a dictionary. Sometimes there is more inside knowledge that a reader would have never known unless they looked it up. Still, it depends on the reader, and the poem they are reading as to whether or not theyll go beyond their own understanding in search of others. Understanding poetry is a difficult task, but that does not mean it cannot be done. Depending on how much time and effort a reader is willing to devote to a poem will affect how wellspring they will understand it, in addition to how much they will enjoy it.