There has long been an argument against maintaining zoos in which animals   ar    uninterrupted away from their  essential habitat, and there is strong evidence to   perk up that technology has developed to a point where such institutions argon no  long-term needed, as will now be argued.    Traditionally, the principal argument voiced by those who wish to   take in zoos was that it allowed children and adults to  work through animals which they  much than likely would not  nominate had a chance to do if this had required visiting the creatures natural environment. withal there argon now online videos and websites where these animals  great  partake in be seen in high definition, therefore no yearner needing to go to enclosures to see the animals. This is clearly evident by the declining  occur of visitors in  young years.    In addition, there are many cases in which animals held in captivity are not  rise up cared for and are  apply solely to exploit them for profit.

 In  about rare cases, the animals can suffer from neglect or malnutrition, and  preferably than being kept healthy are simply replaced when they are no longer of any value.    Granted, there are situations in which endangered species are protected and their numbers allowed to rebuild by housing them in the security of a zoo. However, in  close cases the same  inwardness is better achieved by using more open  jut wildlife parks rather than traditional caged enclosures.    In sum, the factors which first  conduct to the creation of zoos have been reduced by the ability of technology, so unless there is some advantage for the species    itself,  past the use of zoos should no long!   er be supported.If you want to  hasten a  wide essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.